This is not kindness


This is the ego's version of kindness: (1)  judge them. (2) Then tell yourself they deserve pain of some sort. (3) Then pretend you are kinder than they.

This is really condemnation. "Judge not, that you are not judged" this statement is true because we are all one.

Recognize rather that they are all doing their best, and kindness is what they deserve.

Fwd: Dwell Not in Outer Purity


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Colin Drake <colinj108@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:03 PM
Subject: Dwell Not in Outer Purity
To: Dear Explorer <colin108@dodo.com.au>


Dear Fellow Explorers, Here is a 'companion piece' to the earlier posting 'Dwell Not in The Inner Void', Love, Colin

Dwell Not in Outer Purity


Pursue not renunciation,
Dwell not in outer purity;
Be serene in the oneness of things,
And dualism vanishes by itself.

When you strive to gain purity,
The purity thus gained is ever illusory;
As long as you tarry in the dualism,
How can you realise oneness?

Adapted from, and acknowledgements to, Seng-Ts'ans 'On Believing in Mind'

Many people think that by 'purifying the body' (whatever that may mean …) and avoiding desires, by renunciation of the world, they will achieve peace and freedom. In fact many spiritual paths have this aim and whilst they can evoke a certain amount of peace, when the desires have been submerged, this soon evaporates as they resurface, disturbing the temporary peace than has been gained. Moreover, unless the practice reveals the 'oneness of things' and one sees that the 'separate self' is an illusion then one tends to 'tarry in the dualism'.

Also, whilst they may think that, by adopting a certain diet, the body is being purified, unless the process promotes bodily health and harmony it will be counterproductive. The clinging to specific 'purifying' dietary practices also tends to promote arrogance as there is a tendency to judge others as being 'impure'. This is also the case with being a follower of any fixed ideology which regard their adherents as being a 'special group' who have sole access to 'the Truth' and also with any caste (or class) structure where members of the 'higher' castes/classes look down on the lower castes/classes. This whole approach to life will obviously lead to 'tarrying in dualism'.

This attachment to outer purity, or a fixed set of precepts, can also lead to overlooking (and denigrating) pointers provided by awakened beings from other paths. For each has its own list of 'precepts' including those who have none at all! As no group, or ideology, has a monopoly on The Truth this overlooking can be counterproductive in the quest for freedom and the 'realisation of oneness'.

If one attempts to overcome 'tarrying in the dualism', by renunciation - disengaging from the world, then this may lead to some relief from desires as one is not exposed to the objects of desires, which may lead one to believe that a certain amount of 'mental purity' has been achieved. However, this is inherently unstable as exposure to any of the objects will soon reignite desire, even mental exposure (thinking of the desired) will have the same effect. In fact if desire is 'squashed' in this way it often resurfaces with greater intensity.

Actually, of course, the whole notion of purity and impurity stems from a dualistic outlook. For if 'all is one' and everything has the same source, ground of being and final dissolution (The Absolute) then nothing can be impure, for nothing can taint this Absolute as all things just come and go in This leaving It unaffected by their passage. Relating to this there is a famous story about Sankara, the famous Advaita guru of the 8th century, who was returning from his ritual early morning bath when he was touched by an untouchable. He was very angry about this saying that he would be forced to retake his bath as his ritual purity had been violated. The untouchable pointed out that the Atman (Brahman, The Absolute, the essence of each being) is the same in all, so how could he have made Sankara impure by his touch for there was no essential difference between them! At this Sankara came to his senses, realizing the truth of what was said - for this is what he himself had been teaching all along!

 This Absolute is Consciousness at rest in which all manifestation (cosmic energy – Consciousness in motion, or motion in Consciousness) arises, abides, and subsides. For all motion arises in (and from) stillness, exists in a substratum of stillness and finally returns to stillness. Thus there is only oneness, Consciousness, existing in two modes – at rest as Pure Awareness and in motion as Cosmic Energy. Within this our body/minds (thoughts and sensations) are just ephemeral movements (fleeting objects) whilst our essence, the unchanging presence that has witnessed our entire lives, is Pure Awareness. This is easily realized, see the appendix, but the momentum of our minds and previous misidentification tends to swamp this realization. So what is required is to reawaken every time this 'swamping' occurs by repeated investigation. The main symptom of misidentification is unnecessary mental suffering caused by viewing ourselves and  the outside world through the murky filter of (small) self-concern, -interest, -aggrandizement, -loathing, -promotion, etc… the list is almost endless.

When this occurs it should act as a wake up call to the fact that misidentification has occurred and the investigation, that reveals that we are Pure Awareness, needs to recommence. Eventually this becomes almost instantaneous just by seeing that we are aware of this suffering and we are this Awareness, which never suffers being totally unaffected by what comes and goes within it. When this occurs all notions of purity/impurity and renunciation become irrelevant, for we become 'serene in the oneness of things' and 'dualism vanishes by itself'.
In this there is no standard 'model of behaviour' for this will vary greatly from personality to personality type, and the behaviour of some awakened beings may seem to go against all recognized standards of living a 'spiritual life'. Take, for example, Chogyam Trungpa who died at 48 from liver failure due to excessive alcohol consumption and 'slept' with many of his female followers.  Yet he was greatly loved and admired, with over 3,000 at his funeral including lamas that had flown in from all over the globe. There is a case where the husband of one of his 'mistresses' who was asked whether he was jealous, to which he replied "Yes, jealous of my wife for being able to get so close to him!".  Another example is Alan Watts who also drank heavily, which contributed to his early death in his late fifties. However, he is, and was, greatly revered for his wisdom and I am an avid reader of his books.  For all their foibles they were both charismatic, centred, inspiring and happy individuals. This is the key, that they will be 'serene in the oneness of things' no matter how strange their actions may seem at the external level of body/mind.



For information on my books, including the new one "the Happiness That Needs Ntohing', and more articles and poems see the attached.
Lulu are offering 15% off all print books (that's $2.10 off mine) until midnight on the 29th, enter VEGGIE15 at the coupon code.


To define yourself

Is to confine yourself

-Mooji

Sent from my iPad

Lesson 39. Guilt is Hell, Holiness is Heaven

If guilt is hell, what is its opposite?

Like the text for which this workbook was written, the ideas used for the exercises are very simple, very clear and totally unambiguous. We are not concerned with intellectual feats nor logical toys. We are dealing only in the very obvious, which has been overlooked in the clouds of complexity in which you think you think.

If guilt is hell, what is its opposite? This is not difficult, surely. The hesitation you may feel in answering is not due to the ambiguity of the question. But do you believe that guilt is hell? If you did, you would see at once how direct and simple the text is, and you would not need a workbook at all. No one needs practice to gain what is already his.

We have already said that your holiness is the salvation of the world. What about your own salvation? You cannot give what you do not have. A savior must be saved. How else can he teach salvation? Today’s exercises will apply to you, recognizing that your salvation is crucial to the salvation of the world. As you apply the exercises to your world, the whole world stands to benefit.

Your holiness is the answer to every question that was ever asked, is being asked now, or will be asked in the future. Your holiness means the end of guilt, and therefore the end of hell. Your holiness is the salvation of the world, and your own. How could you to whom your holiness belongs be excluded from it? God does not know unholiness. Can it be He does not know His Son?

A full five minutes are urged for the four longer practice periods for today, and longer and more frequent practice sessions are encouraged. If you want to exceed the minimum requirements, more rather than longer sessions are recommended, although both are suggested.

Begin the practice periods as usual, by repeating today’s idea to yourself. Then, with closed eyes, search out your unloving thoughts in whatever form they appear;
  • uneasiness, 
  • depression, 
  • anger, 
  • fear, 
  • worry, 
  • attack, 
  • insecurity and so on. 
Whatever form they take, they are unloving and therefore fearful. And so it is from them that you need to be saved.
Specific situations, events or personalities you associate with unloving thoughts of any kind are suitable subjects for today’s exercises. It is imperative for your salvation that you see them differently. And it is your blessing on them that will save you and give you vision.

Slowly, without conscious selection and without undue emphasis on any one in particular, search your mind for every thought that stands between you and your salvation. Apply the idea for today to each of them in this way:

My unloving thoughts about ___ are keeping me in hell My holiness is my salvation.

You may find these practice periods easier if you intersperse them with several short periods during which you merely repeat today’s idea to yourself slowly a few times. You may also find it helpful to include a few short intervals in which you just relax and do not seem to be thinking of anything. Sustained concentration is very difficult at first. It will become much easier as your mind becomes more disciplined and less distractible.

Meanwhile, you should feel free to introduce variety into the exercise periods in whatever form appeals to you. Do not, however, change the idea itself as you vary the method of applying it. However you elect to use it, the idea should be stated so that its meaning is the fact that your holiness is your salvation. End each practice period by repeating the idea in its original form once more, and adding:

If guilt is hell, what is its opposite?

In the shorter applications, which should be made some three or four times an hour and more if possible, you may ask yourself this question, repeat today’s idea, and preferably both. If temptations arise, a particularly helpful form of the idea is:

My holiness is my salvation from this.

Knowledge, Thinking, and No Thought.





Knowledge, there is no end. We think it will get us somewhere, but rather than use it to  think something new, it is often used to reinvent the past.

The mind also uses it to hide from the present. Why not look at the present silence to investigate it. Why not investigate what is before phenomenon, before material, before the sensual?

That is a challenge indeed.

Being natural

Feel the "i am" feeling. Stay with it. It is already there. You already can feel it. It is already you.

Don't add to it. Don't make a story about it. Don't embelish it with any idea, any religion. Just stay with it. When thoughts come watch them from this feeling place. The more you remain in it, the more it will become your natural state.

But there is an even easier way...

Go to the place that requires no effort. It's a place of isness-- a place of beingness.

Mooji

The idea of a perfect marriage



It seems to me that if you keep trying to change your partner, and that you never give up, you will never melt into one being.

If you can give up wanting to be right, then a perfect match can indeed be had. When your partner speaks from their world, in their terms, with their baggage you allow it fully, not resisting, not hoping to change their view, not arguing in your mind why your view is more correct. 

Instead you recognize their baggage, as you recognize your own. When the mind wants you to compare the two, you recognize it and simply drop the impulse to compare, as you know it is a separation device. Choose instead to see life as it is. 

The ego wants to see the world in terms of "me" vs "you". All mental positions and arguments are simply to create a more improved self image. 

Who are you without a self image? --ah, one with your partner, and one with everyone.